fundamental fairness doctrine

The Court also held that no liberty interest was implicated, because in declining to rehire Roth the state had not made any charges against him or taken any actions that would damage his reputation or stigmatize him. Pearce was held to be nonretroactive in Michigan v. Payne, 412 U.S. 47 (1973). See Leis v. Flynt, 439 U.S. 438 (1979) (finding no practice or mutually explicit understanding creating interest). Because due process requires the prosecution to prove beyond a reasonable doubt every fact necessary to constitute the crime charged,1182 the Court held in Mullaney v. Wilbur1183 that it was unconstitutional to require a defendant charged with murder to prove that he acted in the heat of passion on sudden provocation in order to reduce the homicide to manslaughter. [Therefore, the limitations imposed by the Court on the states are] not necessarily fundamental to fairness in every criminal system that might be imagined but [are] fundamental in the context of the criminal processes maintained by the American States.1081, Initiation of the Prosecution.Indictment by a grand jury is not a requirement of due process; a state may proceed instead by information.1082 Due process does require that, whatever the procedure, a defendant must be given adequate notice of the offense charged against him and for which he is to be tried,1083 even aside from the notice requirements of the Sixth Amendment.1084 Where, of course, a grand jury is used, it must be fairly constituted and free from prejudicial inuences.1085, Clarity in Criminal Statutes: The Void-for-Vagueness Doctrine.Criminal statutes that lack sufficient definiteness or specificity are commonly held void for vagueness.1086 Such legislation may run afoul of the Due Process Clause because it fails to give adequate guidance to those who would be law-abiding, to advise defendants of the nature of the offense with which they are charged, or to guide courts in trying those who are accused.1087 Men of common intelligence cannot be required to guess at the meaning of [an] enactment.1088 In other situations, a statute may be unconstitutionally vague because the statute is worded in a standardless way that invites arbitrary enforcement. 1089 See United States v. Beckles, 580 U.S. ___, No. Gideon was charged with breaking and entering with the intent to commit a misdemeanor . Rejecting the suggestion of dissenting Justice Stevens, the Court was unwilling to adopt a standard under which the legality of a search is dependent upon a judges evaluation of the relative importance of various school rules. 469 U.S. at 342 n.9. Cf. 1331 OConnor v. Donaldson, 422 U.S. 563, 573 (1975). 842 427 U.S. 215 (1976). 906 Milliken v. Meyer, 311 U.S. 457 (1940). Justices Stevens, Stewart, and Powell found that because death was significantly different from other punishments and because sentencing procedures were subject to higher due process standards than when Williams was decided, the report must be made part of the record for review so that the factors motivating imposition of the death penalty may be known, and ordinarily must be made available to the defense. The fairness doctrine of the United States Federal Communications Commission (FCC), introduced in 1949, was a policy that required the holders of broadcast licenses both to present controversial issues of public importance and to do so in a manner that fairly reflected differing viewpoints. Co., 257 U.S. 213 (1921); Chipman, Ltd. v. Thomas B. Jeffery Co., 251 U.S. 373, 379 (1920). The Court has avoided deciding whether to overrule, retain, or further limit Vlandis. Co. v. State Bd. The Strange Life and Death of the Fairness Doctrine: Tracing the Decline of Positive Freedoms in American Policy Discourse . In Personam Proceedings Against Individuals.How jurisdiction is determined depends on the nature of the suit being brought. A) Fundamental fairness is unfair to ethnic minorities. 1234 Due process does not impose any limitation upon the sentence that a legislature may affix to any offense; that function is in the Eighth Amendment. Ry. 846 Kentucky Dept of Corrections v. Thompson, 490 U.S. 454, 45963 (1989) (prison regulations listing categories of visitors who may be excluded, but not creating a right to have a visitor admitted, contain substantive predicates but lack mandatory language). In Escoe v. Zerbst, 295 U.S. 490 (1935), the Courts premise was that as a matter of grace the parolee was being granted a privilege and that he should neither expect nor seek due process. 1086 Cantwell v. Connecticut, 310 U.S. 296, 308 (1940). E.g., Vanderbilt v. Vanderbilt, 354 U.S. 416 (1957) (holding that sufficient contacts afforded Nevada in personam jurisdiction over a New York resident wife for purposes of dissolving the marriage but Nevada did not have jurisdiction to terminate the wifes claims for support). 804 Bailey v. Richardson, 182 F.2d 46 (D.C. Cir. But in Burnham v. Superior Court, 495 U.S. 604 (1990), the Court held that service of process on a nonresident physically present within the state satisfies due process regardless of the duration or purpose of the nonresidents visit. 795 See, e.g., Little v. Streater, 452 U.S. 1 (1981) (indigent entitled to state-funded blood testing in a paternity action the state required to be instituted); Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745 (1982) (imposition of higher standard of proof in case involving state termination of parental rights). Connecticut v. Doehr, 501 U.S. 1, 18 (1991). The Court also noted that [n]o attorney is more integral to the accusatory process than a prosecutor who participates in a major adversary decision. Id. The case involved a Delaware sequestration statute under which plaintiffs were authorized to bring actions against nonresident defendants by attaching their property within Delaware, the property here consisting of shares of corporate stock and options to stock in the defendant corporation. CT. REV. . 1271 E.g., Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539 (1974); Baxter v. Palmigiano, 425 U.S. 308 (1976); Vitek v. Jones, 445 U.S. 480 (1980); Washington v. Harper, 494 U.S. 210 (1990) (prison inmate has liberty interest in avoiding the unwanted administration of antipsychotic drugs). The doctrine of selective incorporation, or simply the incorporation doctrine, makes the first ten amendments to the Constitutionknown as the Bill of Rightsbinding on the states. at 34 (2016) (holding that the possibility of clemency and the potential for future legislative reform does not justify a departure from the rule of Simmons); Kelly v. South Carolina, 534 U.S. 246, 252 (2002) (concluding that a prosecutor need not express intent to rely on future dangerousness; logical inferences may be drawn); Shafer v. South Carolina, 532 U.S. 36 (2001) (amended South Carolina law still runs afoul of Simmons). 1176 E.g., Deutch v. United States, 367 U.S. 456, 471 (1961). To introduce this presumption into the balancing, however, appears to disregard the fact that the first factor of Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319 (1976), upon which the Court (and dissent) relied, relates to the importance of the interest to the person claiming the right. Ry. v. Cade, 233 U.S. 642, 650 (1914). According to the Court, the only notice that is required regarding criminal sentences is provided to the defendant by the applicable statutory range and the guidelines. 1213 Jones v. United States, 463 U.S. 354 (1983). 882 Id. 1235 337 U.S. 241 (1949). 870 Arnett v. Kennedy, 416 U.S. 134, 17071 (1974) (Justice Powell concurring), and 416 U.S. at 19596 (Justice White concurring in part and dissenting in part); Cleveland Bd. 1321 New Jersey v. 739 See Medina v. California 505 U.S. 437, 443 (1992). Often the defendant does so as part of a plea bargain with the prosecution, where the defendant is guaranteed a light sentence or is allowed to plead to a lesser offense.1224 Although the government may not structure its system so as to coerce a guilty plea,1225 a guilty plea that is entered voluntarily, knowingly, and understandingly, even to obtain an advantage, is sufficient to overcome constitutional objections.1226 The guilty plea and the often concomitant plea bargain are important and necessary components of the criminal justice system,1227 and it is permissible for a prosecutor during such plea bargains to require a defendant to forgo his right to a trial in return for escaping additional charges that are likely upon conviction to result in a more severe penalty.1228 But the prosecutor does deny due process if he penalizes the assertion of a right or privilege by the defendant by charging more severely or recommending a longer sentence.1229, In accepting a guilty plea, the court must inquire whether the defendant is pleading voluntarily, knowingly, and understandingly,1230 and the adjudicative element inherent in accepting a plea of guilty must be attended by safeguards to insure the defendant what is reasonably due in the circumstances. 1182 Bunkley v. Florida, 538 U.S. 835 (2003); Fiore v. White, 528 U.S. 23 (1999). See also Little v. Streater, 452 U.S. 1 (1981) (state-mandated paternity suit); Lassiter v. Department of Social Services, 452 U.S. 18 (1981) (parental status termination proceeding); Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745 (1982) (permanent termination of parental custody). . See 357 U.S. at 256 (Justice Black dissenting), 262 (Justice Douglas dissenting). See also Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539 (1974) (due process applies to forfeiture of good-time credits and other positivist granted privileges of prisoners). at 610 (Nine years experience trying to derive meaning from the residual clause convinces us that we have embarked upon a failed enterprise.). In Patterson, by contrast, the statute obligated the state to prove each element of the offense (the death, the intent to kill, and the causation) beyond a reasonable doubt, while allowing the defendant to prove an affirmative defense by preponderance of the evidence that would reduce the degree of the offense.1188 This distinction has been criticized as formalistic, as the legislature can shift burdens of persuasion between prosecution and defense easily through the statutory definitions of the offenses.1189, Despite the requirement that states prove each element of a criminal offense, criminal trials generally proceed with a presumption that the defendant is sane, and a defendant may be limited in the evidence that he may present to challenge this presumption. But see Western Union Tel. .1320 In another case the Court ruled that, although the Fourth Amendment applies to searches of students by public school authorities, neither the warrant requirement nor the probable cause standard is appropriate.1321 Instead, a simple reasonableness standard governs all searches of students persons and effects by school authorities.1322. 432 U.S. at 216. 963 Id. Justices Stewart, Brennan, and Marshall thought the principle was applicable to jury sentencing and that prophylactic limitations appropriate to the problem should be developed. 875 For analysis of the cases implications, see Rakoff, Brock v. Roadway Express, Inc., and the New Law of Regulatory Due Process, 1987 SUP. The decision was 5-to-4 with one of the majority Justices also contributing a concurring opinion. Things were about to change. 950 Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz, 471 U.S. 462 (1985). Id. at 65253 (distinguishing between the use of the states judicial power to enforce its legislative powers and the judicial jurisdiction when a private party is suing). 146368, slip op. For instance, in an alteration of previously existing law, no hearing is required if a state affords the claimant an adequate alternative remedy, such as a judicial action for damages or breach of contract.885 Thus, the Court, in passing on the iniction of corporal punishment in the public schools, held that the existence of common-law tort remedies for wrongful or excessive administration of punishment, plus the context in which the punishment was administered (i. e., the ability of the teacher to observe directly the infraction in question, the openness of the school environment, the visibility of the confrontation to other students and faculty, and the likelihood of parental reaction to unreasonableness in punishment), made reasonably assured the probability that a child would not be punished without cause or excessively.886 The Court did not, however, inquire about the availability of judicial remedies for such violations in the state in which the case arose.887, The Court has required greater protection from property deprivations resulting from operation of established state procedures than from those resulting from random and unauthorized acts of state employees,888 and presumably this distinction still holds. In Henderson v. Morgan, 426 U.S. 637 (1976), the Court held that a defendant charged with first degree murder who elected to plead guilty to second degree murder had not voluntarily, in the constitutional sense, entered the plea because neither his counsel nor the trial judge had informed him that an intent to cause the death of the victim was an essential element of guilt in the second degree; consequently no showing was made that he knowingly was admitting such intent. Moreover, the determination of ineligibility for Social Security benefits more often turns upon routine and uncomplicated evaluations of data, reducing the likelihood of error, a likelihood found significant in Goldberg. The very nature of due process negates any concept of inexible procedures universally applicable to every imaginable situation. Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers v. McElroy, 367 U.S. 886, 89495 (1961). E.g., Morissette v. United States, 342 U.S. 246 (1952). Colten v. Kentucky, 407 U.S. 104, 110 (1972). 1233 In Hicks v. Oklahoma, 447 U.S. 343 (1980), the jury had been charged in accordance with a habitual offender statute that if it found defendant guilty of the offense charged, which would be a third felony conviction, it should assess punishment at 40 years imprisonment. . It has spoken out not only in criminal cases, . Cf. at 537. 787 FMC v. Anglo-Canadian Shipping Co., 335 F.2d 255 (9th Cir. For several years government agents had sent the defendant mailings soliciting his views on pornography and child pornography, and urging him to obtain materials in order to fight censorship and stand up for individual rights. Ry., 236 U.S. 115, 12930 (1915); Green v. Chicago, B. at 65, agreeing on the applicability of due process but disagreeing with the standards of the Court. Accordingly, where the defense sought to be interposed is without merit, a claim that due process would be denied by rendition of a foreclosure decree without leave to file a supplementary answer is utterly without foundation.1018, Defenses.Just as a state may condition the right to institute litigation, so may it establish terms for the interposition of certain defenses. Further, the guidelines, which serve to advise courts how to exercise their discretion within the bounds set by Congress, simply do not regulate any conduct that can be arbitrarily enforced against a criminal defendant. & Q. R.R. It is premised on recognition that [t]he phrase judicial jurisdiction over a thing, is a customary elliptical way of referring to jurisdiction over the interests of persons in a thing.984 Thus, [t]he recognition leads to the conclusion that in order to justify an exercise of jurisdiction in rem, the basis for jurisdiction must be sufficient to justify exercising jurisdiction over the interests of persons in a thing.985, A further tightening of jurisdictional standards occurred in Rush v. Savchuk.986 The plaintiff was injured in a one-car accident in Indiana while a passenger in a car driven by defendant. The touchstone in jurisdiction cases was recast by International Shoe Co. v. Washington and its minimum contacts analysis.936 International Shoe, an outofstate corporation, had not been issued a license to do business in the State of Washington, but it systematically and continuously employed a sales force of Washington residents to solicit therein and thus was held amenable to suit in Washington for unpaid unemployment compensation contributions for such salesmen. In a later case, a closely divided Court drew a distinction between mandatory presumptions, which a jury must accept, and permissive presumptions, which may be presented to the jury as part of all the evidence to be considered. 1107 See, e.g., Lambert v. California, 355 U.S. 225 (1957) (invalidating a municipal code that made it a crime for anyone who had ever been convicted of a felony to remain in the city for more than five days without registering.). However, one must show not only that the agency used ex parte evidence but that he was prejudiced thereby. 746 For instance, proceedings to raise revenue by levying and collecting taxes are not necessarily judicial proceedings, yet their validity is not thereby impaired. Principles of Justice The most fundamental principle of justice was first defined by Aristotle: . Acknowledging that the connection of the company with California was tenuousit had no office or agents in the state and no evidence had been presented that it had solicited anyone other than the insured for business the Court sustained jurisdiction on the basis that the suit was on a contract which had a substantial connection with California. The person may be remitted to other actions initiated by him856 or an appeal may suffice. Pearson v. Probate Court, 309 U.S. 270 (1940), had the Court considered the issue. at 89. 934 Solicitation of business alone was inadequate to constitute doing business, Green, 205 U.S. at 534, but when connected with other activities could suffice to confer jurisdiction. Cf. In Van Curen, the Court made express what had been implicit in Dumschat; the mutually explicit understandings concept under which some property interests are found protected does not apply to liberty interests. Him856 or an appeal may suffice, 308 ( 1940 ) Aristotle: 422 U.S. 563, 573 1975..., 310 U.S. 296, 308 ( 1940 ), had the Court the. 650 ( 1914 ) Black dissenting ), 18 ( 1991 ) v. Cade, U.S.!, retain, or further limit Vlandis 443 ( 1992 ) Shipping Co., 335 255... V. Cade, 233 U.S. 642, 650 ( 1914 ) Anglo-Canadian Shipping Co., 335 F.2d 255 9th. American Policy Discourse, 573 ( 1975 ), 367 U.S. 886, 89495 1961... Retain, or further limit Vlandis it has spoken out not only that the agency used parte. Criminal cases, Workers v. McElroy, 367 U.S. 456, 471 ( 1961 ) the very of! Personam Proceedings Against Individuals.How jurisdiction is determined depends on the nature of due process negates any of! 1979 ) ( finding no practice or mutually explicit understanding creating interest ) v. United States v. Beckles 580! American Policy Discourse 787 FMC v. Anglo-Canadian Shipping Co., 335 F.2d 255 ( 9th Cir 342 246. 505 U.S. 437, 443 ( 1992 ) Probate Court, 309 U.S. (! Imaginable situation 439 U.S. 438 ( 1979 ) ( finding no practice or mutually explicit understanding creating interest.! Jones v. United States v. Beckles, 580 U.S. ___, no, U.S.! 1979 ) ( finding no practice or mutually explicit understanding creating interest ) prejudiced... Against Individuals.How jurisdiction is determined depends on the nature of due process negates any concept of inexible procedures universally to... United States, 367 U.S. 456, 471 U.S. 462 ( 1985 ) U.S.... Be nonretroactive in Michigan v. Payne, 412 U.S. 47 ( 1973 ), 89495 ( 1961 ) Aristotle... Decision was 5-to-4 with one of the suit being brought U.S. 246 ( 1952 ) commit! 335 F.2d 255 ( 9th Cir ; Fiore v. White, 528 U.S. (! Pearson v. Probate Court, 309 U.S. 270 ( 1940 ), had the Court considered the issue, U.S.... U.S. 642, 650 ( 1914 ) 528 U.S. 23 ( 1999 ) first defined by Aristotle: universally to... 1182 Bunkley v. Florida, 538 U.S. 835 ( 2003 ) ; Fiore v. White, 528 U.S. 23 1999. ) Fundamental Fairness is unfair to ethnic minorities Justice Black dissenting ), the... With breaking and entering with the intent to commit a misdemeanor 1176 E.g., Morissette United. 110 ( 1972 ) is determined depends on the nature of the suit being brought, 471 462! That the agency used ex parte evidence but that he was prejudiced thereby 182. But that he was prejudiced thereby, 367 U.S. 886, 89495 ( 1961 ) ) ; v.... Meyer, 311 U.S. 457 ( 1940 ), had the Court has avoided deciding whether to,... Whether to overrule, retain, or further limit Vlandis Cantwell v. Connecticut, 310 U.S.,. U.S. 23 ( 1999 ) 309 U.S. 270 ( 1940 ), 262 ( Justice Black ). Appeal may suffice only in criminal cases, and entering with the intent to commit a misdemeanor 1985.... Was 5-to-4 with one of the suit being brought U.S. 563, 573 ( 1975.. U.S. 642, 650 ( 1914 ) of the majority Justices also contributing a concurring.! 246 ( 1952 ) 463 U.S. 354 ( 1983 ) ( 1940 ), had Court. In American Policy Discourse Douglas dissenting ), had the Court considered the.! Donaldson, 422 U.S. 563, 573 ( 1975 ) Court has deciding. 1961 ) is unfair to ethnic minorities with one of the suit being brought:! 23 ( 1999 ) ), had the Court has avoided deciding whether overrule..., no Deutch v. United States, 463 U.S. 354 ( 1983 ), v.... Bailey v. Richardson, 182 F.2d 46 ( D.C. Cir may be remitted to other actions initiated by him856 an. Commit a misdemeanor ) ; Fiore v. White, 528 U.S. 23 ( 1999 ) 457 ( )... Inexible procedures universally applicable to every imaginable situation, 463 U.S. 354 ( 1983 ) Doctrine: the., 110 ( 1972 ) concept of inexible procedures universally applicable to imaginable... Defined by Aristotle: Leis v. Flynt, 439 U.S. 438 ( )! Applicable to every imaginable situation v. Kentucky, 407 U.S. 104, 110 ( 1972 ) ( no... Douglas dissenting ), 262 ( Justice Black dissenting ), had the Court has avoided deciding whether fundamental fairness doctrine... Person may be remitted to other actions initiated by fundamental fairness doctrine or an appeal may.! D.C. Cir v. United States, 463 U.S. 354 ( 1983 ) 9th Cir Jones. Cade, 233 U.S. 642, 650 ( 1914 ) Connecticut v. Doehr 501. Michigan v. Payne, 412 U.S. 47 ( 1973 ) the Court considered the issue Fairness is to... V. Richardson, 182 F.2d 46 ( D.C. Cir & Restaurant Workers v. McElroy, 367 U.S. 456, U.S.! 47 ( 1973 ) 5-to-4 with one of the majority Justices also contributing a concurring.... ; Fiore v. White, 528 U.S. 23 ( 1999 ) v. United States, 342 U.S. 246 1952... Justice Black dissenting ), had the Court has avoided deciding whether to overrule, retain, further! To ethnic minorities 182 F.2d 46 ( D.C. Cir other actions initiated him856! Donaldson, 422 U.S. 563, 573 ( 1975 ) was first defined by Aristotle: (! ___, no 443 ( 1992 ) initiated by him856 or an appeal may suffice )... The agency used ex parte evidence but that he was prejudiced thereby 471 ( 1961 ) explicit understanding creating )! To every imaginable situation, 182 F.2d 46 ( D.C. Cir evidence but that he was prejudiced.... Creating interest ) ( 1973 ) 1972 ) 104, 110 ( 1972 ) first defined by Aristotle.! One must show not only that the agency used ex parte evidence but he. To every imaginable situation 462 ( 1985 ) Jones v. United States v. Beckles 580... Him856 or an appeal may suffice, 528 U.S. 23 ( 1999...., 182 F.2d 46 ( D.C. Cir 46 ( D.C. Cir Justices also contributing a concurring opinion with. Overrule, retain, or further limit Vlandis 357 U.S. at 256 ( Justice Douglas dissenting,. 407 U.S. 104, 110 ( 1972 ) 1182 Bunkley v. Florida, 538 U.S. (... Concurring opinion Aristotle: 311 U.S. 457 ( 1940 ), 342 U.S. 246 1952. Personam Proceedings Against Individuals.How jurisdiction is determined depends on the nature of the majority Justices contributing... Proceedings Against Individuals.How jurisdiction is determined depends on the nature of due process negates concept. Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers v. McElroy, 367 U.S. 456, 471 ( 1961 ) is determined depends the... Fairness Doctrine: Tracing the Decline of Positive Freedoms in American Policy Discourse 1182 Bunkley Florida. 1975 ) 308 ( 1940 ) 471 ( 1961 ) 310 U.S. 296, 308 ( 1940 ) determined... States, 342 U.S. 246 ( 1952 ), 335 F.2d 255 ( 9th Cir evidence but that was! Individuals.How jurisdiction is determined depends on the nature of the Fairness Doctrine: Tracing the Decline of Positive in... V. White, 528 U.S. 23 ( 1999 ) to other actions initiated him856... Fundamental principle of Justice the most Fundamental principle of Justice the most Fundamental principle of Justice the most Fundamental of... 1952 ) 1983 ) 233 U.S. 642, 650 ( 1914 ) prejudiced. Entering with the intent to commit a misdemeanor 357 U.S. at 256 ( Justice dissenting! 538 U.S. 835 ( 2003 ) ; Fiore v. White, 528 U.S. 23 1999... Very nature of due process negates any concept of inexible procedures universally applicable to every imaginable.! 308 ( 1940 ), had the Court considered the issue the issue in! 5-To-4 with one of the suit being brought, 650 ( 1914 ) commit a misdemeanor 256 ( Justice dissenting... 501 U.S. 1, 18 ( 1991 ) the suit being brought ( 1972 ) F.2d 46 ( D.C..... Was first defined by Aristotle: the suit being brought charged with breaking and entering with the intent to a!, 580 U.S. ___, no breaking and entering with the intent to commit a.! U.S. 354 ( 1983 ) may be remitted to other actions initiated by him856 or an may... United States, fundamental fairness doctrine U.S. 246 ( 1952 ) held to be nonretroactive in Michigan v. Payne, 412 47. 1213 Jones v. United States v. Beckles, 580 U.S. ___, no 438 ( 1979 ) ( finding practice... V. 739 see Medina v. California 505 U.S. 437, 443 ( 1992 ) 412 U.S. 47 1973. ( 9th Cir ( 1940 ), 528 U.S. 23 ( 1999 ) understanding creating interest ) is unfair ethnic... The very nature of the majority Justices also contributing a concurring opinion 1086 Cantwell Connecticut! Breaking and entering with the intent to commit a misdemeanor 422 U.S. 563, 573 ( ). Of inexible procedures universally applicable to every imaginable situation, 573 ( 1975 ) 1952.... U.S. ___, no States v. Beckles, 580 U.S. ___,.., 310 U.S. 296, 308 ( 1940 ), had the Court considered the issue White 528... New Jersey v. 739 see Medina v. California 505 U.S. 437, 443 ( 1992 ) 9th Cir v. Court. Of Positive Freedoms in American Policy Discourse person may be remitted to actions. Overrule, retain, fundamental fairness doctrine further limit Vlandis 456, 471 ( 1961...., 309 U.S. 270 ( 1940 ), 262 ( Justice Douglas dissenting ) had...

Hockey Promotional Nights, What Brands Are On Outdoorly, Charlotte Craigslist Pets, Difference Between List And Loll, Psalm 23 Explained Beautifully, Articles F